Kyrgyzstan
Striving towards democracy and economic development


V.I.P. INTERVIEWS
Ulan Sarbanov Interview with
Ulan Sarbanov
Chairman of the National Bank of Kyrgyzstan
August 15th 2002
Can you tell us a little bit about history of establishment of the National Bank and its main duties? How the bank has contributed to the improvement of the economy of Kyrgyzstan?

Our history is very short; we are just 11 years old. Previously it was called Kyrgyz Office of the State Bank of the Soviet Union and the office was very small in this exact same building. The main duties were just cash handling, delivering to the rural areas and reporting back to Moscow. I would say it was not really a central bank. The bank really became a central a little bit later; I can say that it is not because of the law which past in December 1991, but because we introduced our national currency. We did it on May 10th, in 1993. From that time it seems to be there was a real possibility to call the National Bank and central bank of the country, because we are pursuing so-called independent monetary policy.

Basically the purpose or the main criteria of the central bank is achievement and maintenance of the price stability. This is the main goal and according to the legislation we also have so-called main task, which is preserving and keeping the purchasing power of national currency, through the implementation of the appropriate monetary policy. We are responsible at the same time for the banking system and the payment system. All the rest we are doing is more or less similar to all functions of the central bank. There is an exception we are doing calculation of the balance of payment and preparing forecast of balance of payment for the government together with national statistics. It is not a business of government; it is the business of the two independent institutions, the statistical committee and central bank. Basically what we need to do is first of all to keep low inflation and price stability. I can give you some short examples.

I have a question regarding your answer. Last year there were a number of banks that were declared insolvent or rather their operations were not as clear and adequate as the standards that the government had established demanded. They were declared insolvent and they were removed from operations. How would you describe the banking sector of Kyrgyzstan today? Do you think that because of this move it has been sanitized and improved?

The situation is quite different. I was appointed as a governor of the Central Bank in January of 1999. I faced this problem of a frugal banking system. Some local people said this was a clear banking crisis. I can't call a banking crisis, because even though it was an unstable situation there was nothing to indicate the banking sector was crisis just because of bankruptcy of some banks. Some of the creditors, including depositors and maybe some entrepreneurs were losing a significant part of their money, but they were not becoming bankrupt. This was clearly not a banking crisis but the situation was very serious. From the year 1999 until now we have been working on detailed analysis of the eight commercial banks. The total number of commercial banks at the current moment is around 21. It was a really difficult situation because in 1999 and early 2000 I was just in fact feeling myself like on the surgery table, not an old body, not a young body but something not in a good shape. Deciding weather to close a bank after only one week of having became the governor of the Central Bank was not an easy task.

During 1999-2000 we closed 4 out of the 5 biggest banks. This created really big social tension and a generated a hot discussions in government, the media and the parliament. We had a difficult time. What can I say now is that we closed about 8 banks. In contrast we were able to open the second one, Kyrgyzstan Industrial Credit Bank that is a joint branch between Agahan foundation for economic development. The main shareholders are EBRD, the German Agency for Development and our government. This is the biggest bank, which is going to be in charge of managing medium and long-term investments, so in practice we can call it a development bank. My assessment of the current situation is that the banking system is become healthier than previously was. If you ask serious businessmen, 80% of them are saying that within last two years the local banking service has improved. Of course they want to have a higher level of satisfaction and services from banks. The banking system is shrinking and banking assets are only 4% of GDP. Banks sizes have been reduced, but the capital is increasing substantially and as a result the banking system is becoming profitable again.

Three years ago the total loss of banking system was around 360 million soms. Last year the banking system was totally profitable for the first year in a long time.

During the first half of this year almost 90% of the local banks forecast that the half-year was very profitable. This is the reason I am saying there is improvement, but I am not praising the current state of the banking system because our society is not happy still.

Kyrgyz society is not happy because from one side people want to get more credit, which is understandable, but it is likely to be difficult. The banking system is still not consolidated and it is not strong enough to help in some area maybe lift economic rules.

Nevertheless the National Bank is basically recipient of the rest of the banks in the republic. You secure all deposits of the remaining banks. Do you perform that function?

No, we don't provide that service. In this stage of development we don't give a guarantee. What we guarantee to society is that every commercial bank will go through a full inspection at least once a year. Also we prepare them to publicize what is called regulatory responsible policy, which is written in very simple language. For example, if a bank is fully capitalized and has no problem we just indicate to the state that there will be no special attention to this bank except for one full inspection a year. It is publicized in mass media, to become more transparent, because after posing the event they start complaining. It can be explained with some subjective reasons because we don't want that we explain the general rules. So we explain to all society that we agreed on this rule with the parliament, government and now we are trying to secure what we publicize.

Nevertheless is it the only way you are utilizing to bring straight public faith within the banking system?

No, we are in the process of creating a of public campaign, which will be called " I love my bank". Because the banking system is undoubtedly becoming healthier. I talked with almost all commercial banks' chairmen, presidents, CEO´s and we agreed to start from the end of September. There will be some regular open door meetings and every commercial bank will explain themselves.

We will be sending representatives just to make sure that people are really trying to do their best to draw a healthy picture, because in front of supervisors one cannot make false advertisement. By the end of September we will be ready to present people a new banking reform program. There will be a document, which will not only consist from nice words about whatever, but we are very practical, maybe 30-40 practical stages in each area of banking and financial sectors.

How we are going to do a financial market, what it is going to happen with government securities market, stock market, insurance company, investment etc. Everybody will know what we are going to deal with to the end up to the end year, what we are going to deal with next year, and what we have in mind to deal within 3 years. The most important thing is to lead some kind of reform, because people sometimes t think the reform is how the people are just talking but no real changes. We want to replace this rule so that we may inform of what exactly we are going to do, who will be responsible and the most important thing the timing of this action.

As you yourself mentioned in the beginning one of the main tasks of the National Bank is to preserve the purchasing power of the national currency. In the last 12 months the som has showed a lot of the strength and it is a quiet stable currency. To what you attribute the stability, is there a specific policies you have adopted to maintain such strength of your currency?

First of all, when we introduced the national currency we chose a flexible exchange rate regime. At that time there was a lot of criticism about why we were choosing the flexible exchange rate system. People criticized it very much saying that is was a dirty bag and with many managing faults. It is not true, when now the situation and trade partners are developing and people are realizing that we made a right choice in the beginning in 1993. If at that time president had not supported the Central Bank it would had been a disaster. Now it has been proven that it was the right choice for and early independence state. Later on Russia changed their exchange rate regime for the same system. It was also the direction taken in Kazakhstan back in 1999. Later on I hope there will be some progress in foreign exchange rate policies of our respectful big neighbor like Uzbekistan. There is nothing artificial. Artificial from the point of view that we are not sorting the international reserves of the country, which we are managing.

Every year if you look at the dynamics we are becoming the net purchaser on the market and we are not supporting the national currency artificially with just by selling dollars. I would say that it this sound monetary policy is contributing to it. Maybe the most important thing is the structural reform program. It seems as if Kyrgyzstan is one of the countries which undertook land reform from early on in its independence and doing it even against some political resistance from the political side. Not all the people understand the issue of the land reform. Now land reform is giving some force, for example we are one of the first countries, which is allowing constitutional private ownership of land. Maybe it is difficult to understand for the people who don't remember and do not understand what is private ownership, it is a big step. Now the land is a subject for trade, with some restrictions such as foreigners cannot buy land but they can rent for long term up to 40 years. There are some restrictions for the inhabitants of big cities.

From my point of view it is understandable, but nevertheless the price of land is a market deal not a private deal. There was a tender; a publication on mass media, that stated that depending on the quality of land the price also differs. Concerning the structured reform, in addition to land reform, we are choosing a liberal regime of the economic liberalism, which is possible. We are liberalizing prices, facilitating foreign trade relation, and encouraging the possibility to open small medium size business. It is not easy to do, but now overtime after 7-8 or 10 years it is giving some hopes. Why The actual the share of the private sector of GDP is much higher than in neighboring countries of CIS. We have great potential and I am sure that our entrepreneurs are very competitive and they can do it. The only problem that we can't realize is that we are a double land lock country and we have a so- called not successful economic reform. We are sometimes experiencing that we are not very successful at handling all the trade restrictions that our trade partners impose on Kyrgyzstan. If neighboring countries are doing well as Kazakhstan and Russia this year they will have high economic growth.
Then we can discuss and abolish some trade restrictions from neighboring countries. It will be very good; export will increase if not bloom. Our entrepreneurs are functioning under market conditions, unless, if we had an access to Uzbek market. I am sure we can compete very successfully. This is good sound economic policy. Particularly in last two years we gained some achievment and strength in our fiscal discipline. Before because it was really difficult situation of some mistakes in early days of independence, we have quiet significant external debt. But we have a strategy to achieve sustainable external debt, one step is already is passed and in March of this year we get so-called place club treatment. This year we are hoping to continue some economic policy and we already got commitments from creditors from the place club. If everything will be good with economic policy we are going to discuss in reality this treatment, which is good anyway.

Regarding inflation, the National Bank can be credited for maintaining inflation at the reasonable level. It has stayed around 12 % mark, and sometime came down much lower than that and it is expected that this year it should not exceed 8%. What are your predictions for remaining of the year? Do you think the inflation will remain at this level, grow or perhaps even decrease?

We have a tactic not to increase than 5 % which has been no problem because for the first 7 months from end of July to end of December it was about 2 %. This is very good indicator. Inflation is not going to be higher than 5 %. The second thing is that in last 12 months inflation was around 1,5 %, which is for people who do not know about Kyrgyzstan, slightly change. But this is done because of sound monetary and fiscal policy. Monetary policy for last 8 years was quiet tight, which should be. The only one explanation for low inflation is the problem with trade restriction. To realize the potential of Kyrgyz economy we need to get an access to outside market. If we gain access to external market, maybe there will be slight increase in inflation but not anymore we are going to allow more than 10 % inflation in any case. We have the media term type that inflation in next 5 years should not exceed 5 %. Depending on current situation we are discussing in some years maybe 3 % or 4 % in some cases.

Inflation directly affects the credit interest rates. How would you rate the percentage of interest rates given on commercial loans to small and medium enterprises in Kyrgyzstan? Do you think it is adequate; is it properly stimulating these enterprises so vital to developing economy?

Of course not, these is the macro economic stability looking for inflation and exchange rate. All of them somehow result in market rate so-called deposit because it is quiet low; it is still positive in real term, 6-8 % is quiet low. As for market rate for loans it is still high. In national currency it is around 25 %, in foreign currency it is around 14 %.

Looking for margin between the loans there is one explanation. The society, the depositors are more smart and related to the macroeconomic stability and low inflation. I cannot say about random credit because problem is that banking reform is still on the way. If we can convince and prepare transparent strict rules with a relation to so-called inside activity, which is inside of isolated company if they had the bad activity previous several years. If we can break through this problem, it used to be the case of inflation. We are going to use all possible market means just to push this rate down.

But we are not going to use administration rules. This is the worse thing we can do, when we are implementing liberal economic policy. The entrepreneurs' side is not happy and we are also not happy with that.

The National Bank has also committed itself to the attraction of foreign investment to Kyrgyzstan. In what ways are you contributing or insentivating foreign investors to come and invest to the republic?

First of all we are together with the government responsible for macroeconomic stability. Secondly thing that we are doing is we are giving full picture to all investors. Sometimes we are favoring some positive things. But we never do misleading. We have a problem we are showing how we are going to solve this problem. We are talking openly, explaining where are positive things and it seems investor should understand the opportunity that if they have a stable situation, no problem and quiet. But if one day the situation will challenge then it will the best to return for investors. Another thing we are trying to do is, we are one of the leading institutions in the area that is informally responsible to make financial transparency.

In all the means like in looking for annual report provided. From our point of view it is realistic information. It is not an investment guide of the country, but people who read the annual report of the National Bank will get the full real picture of the economy. We are also responsible for the international counting standards. We introduced it in the banking system. The banking system is operating under international accounting system for 5 years. Together with government we are trying to do new international standards for counts. All financial reports should be in accordance with international standards. We are also helping the government in this area. Basically that is all, all the rest was indicated under the law whatever good banking system we can put and even small whatever they are good. Payment service is good; exchange rate is flexible and no restrictions, no administrative barriers and no special permissions.

Everybody can open account here and abroad. We just request to register accounts not in purpose of regulating them but just to give information.

Kyrgyzstan might offer lots of opportunities for investment but there is still a lack of knowledge about the existence of possibilities here among international investors. What is your bank doing to promote Kyrgyzstan's image abroad as an investment destination?

We are not obliged to do something. We are to deal with domestic problems. We collect right information and clear picture for investors. We are promoting investments through our publications. Central Bank publishes annual reports, monthly decrees, monthly statistical bulletins, and weekly press releases. All publications are in the state language, which is Kyrgyz, and official language, which is Russian. We are publicizing activities and economic situation in English as possible. Of course we are building up to quiet good relations of some Central banks. We plan to promote information about Kyrgyzstan through Central Bank. Economic financial banking was promoting that this is the small country, which has a very good potential and quiet good people. Kyrgyzstan has nothing to do with Islam and all restrictions. We are in Asia, but our mentality is more likely European. I feel much more comfortable talking in United Kingdom, for example not to young generation probably talking to some solid station country It is also sometimes difficult even though mind is quiet different.

Our readers not just interested in the professional person but also in the man behind it. If you could tell us a little bit about your personal profile and your previous experience before you became the chairman of the National Bank? What achievement you feel most important in you professional career?

It is very unusual. If three years ago somebody told me that I would be the chairman of the Central Bank I would not believe him. My major in university was economics; it was some kind of mixture between mathematics, economics and management, very strange animal I was. Nobody understood why I took that road but now I have lots of advantages in regards to other people because of this strange background mixture. When I was starting a degree, I studied and lived in Russia, when the National Council was introduced I was invited to comeback to the country to try to work for my homeland. I agreed and started my career in the central bank in June 1993 just as an economist. It was quite challenging time. I wasn't afraid to face any problems, but rather when there was some problem I was enjoyed trying to find a way to solve it.

There was a big reshuffle in the 1999. In the end of 1998 when there was a crisis in Russia a reshuffle in government took place. I was invited to work as a minister of finance, I talked with them and I was interviewed. The prime minister agreed and I was appointed as a first deputy minister of finance. I was ready to say good bye to my colleagues at the central bank. In the morning

I was presented to the staff of the ministry of finance. I tried to organize all papers, sitting and looking at my new office in the ministry of finance. In the afternoon I was called to the president's office, saying that the president wanted to see me. It was the first time I was to meet the president. I am not afraid of people, but what kind of numbers I should get with me, what kind of the discussion will be in short I was not really comfortable. After my first meeting with the president that lasted two hours in which we discussed very important topics I was again back in the Central Bank. We spoke on how big money can influence badly on people.

After two hours I was in the Central Bank but now as a chairman of it. I went from being deputy minister of finance to chairman of the Central Bank in just 24 hours and was very strange. But I am happy because I knew all the staff of the Central Bank. They are quite young and they are supporting me. But it is not easy. We should not look for short term actions society but rather we must look for longer terms. It is quite challenging to have several young people have possibility not only to talk what should be done but also just explain to people what we can do. There are lots of problems at my job, which I am happy to solve.

Perhaps one last request, do you have a message to send to investors and readers about Kyrgyzstan?

Not many people come to Kyrgyzstan because they don't know that we have very good people, beautiful landscape and many attractions . The significant portion of the population consists of young people. We want to do something for them; while at the same time we fully respect the older generation. We want opportunities for us, for investors and we want to use our opportunities to create wealth and a better life for older generations. We have huge projects for potential investors, like hydroelectric power station building and we have neighbors like China that would be willing to consume it. We have huge opportunities in tourism like Indian people can enjoy our four seasons. We have many other small projects, such as mountains, mineral waters, ecologically clean air and food, which is much tastier than western food in supermarkets. We are not directly involved in business but we are ready to assist in order to explain where and when a potential investor has possibilities to invest in profitable areas.

  Read on