Kyrgyzstan
Striving towards democracy and economic development


V.I.P. INTERVIEWS
Interview with
Mr. Ravshan Jeenbekov
Chairman of State Property Fund
The State property fund is an organization that you find in many countries under different names and their responsibilities may differ, could you perhaps underline for us the main responsibilities and competencies of the State property fund here in Kyrgyzstan and the role it serves within privatization process?

Our department was established in January 1991 and I think in all the countries such agency is created during the transition period. The mission of them is to cope with temporary tasks, which are set for them by their Governments. So you know that during the Soviet time there was no private ownership and this very agency was established in order to privatize the state property. This is one of the functions of this agency, as well as to manage the property, which belongs to the state nowadays. These are only two directions of our agency, besides this we are working on creating investment climate in our republic, establishing investment policy of our Government, and we are dealing with bankruptcy issues in our country.

The state property fund is also in charge of recovering bankrupt enterprises, do you think that the large number of bankrupt enterprises can be salvage with the necessary influx of foreign capital. Do these enterprises remain viable that they will have to be completely eliminated?

Of course, investors can buy those enterprises, which are under the bankruptcy procedure as well. Bankruptcy is not just liquidation of enterprise, in the positive meaning of this word, it is a change of owner. In the process of bankruptcy, special administrator is seeking for the investors or those people who are interested in buying this enterprise and his main task is to find new owner or to sell to them without interfering the normal process of production cycle and stopping their processes and pay out the debts they had before. And administrator sells that part of the company, which interests the potential investors. And those assets of this enterprise, which did not find interest with the investor, can be sold separately. It is only one kind of bankruptcy, but there are several other types, like reorganization, sanation, but these kinds of bankruptcy should be obligatorily implemented with the help of state, budget.

As our government does not have budget reserves we unfortunately could not apply those types of bankruptcy in the practice nowadays. Therefore we mainly apply liquidation by selling the object.

We met with minister of transportation and during our conversation he highlighted the sell of 51 % of shares or controlling stake of Kyrgyz Telecom. This is, of course, the most anticipated privatization in Kyrgyzstan, could you give us an insight when it will take place or when it will start?

In order for you to have a detailed information I would like to say that we are selling 51 % of JSC "KyrgyzTelecom" and one should clarify here that 51 % of the whole joint stock company, not the state share as the state has 87-90% in this company. Therefore under further informing of potential investors it would be clear that the control stake of KyrgyzTelecom is under sale. We have got a permission from Parliament. Hired a financial-legal advisor on selling Kyrgyztelecom, which is an American company "Deloi Tush". At the moment, we are conducting joint work, prepare tender documentation and their preparation is under its finalizing stage. Sometimes within a month I think we will start promotion through mass media, Internet and by embassies accredited in Kyrgyzstan as well as through our embassies abroad.

In attracting foreign investment Should all joint stock companies provide obligatory reports on their financial activities, this is one of the conditions that has applied to some enterprises but not to the whole of state owned enterprises. Do you think, perhaps, that it would be advisable or good idea to make it mandatory, so that investors could feel more comfortable and secure when bringing in their capital in the Kyrgyzstan and into those enterprises?

You know, you are asking the right question, in general, and particularly concerning Reemtsma it is not quite correct as this company is not state but private. There is no state share of stocks in this company. And in general the companies where there is a state share they are reporting, we request them to provide reports as we are conducting shareholders meeting and our state is a main shareholder of those companies. But at the moment there are 250 enterprises, where we have state share of stocks from 10 to 100%.

Out of 276 enterprises with state share the government has controlling stake of 51 % in 187 enterprises still or has that number decreased?

Nowadays this figure is decreasing because we have adopted a privatization program. This is like a last stage of state property privatization in Kyrgyzstan. On the base of this privatization program we have already started the privatization of those enterprises, which are still with state hands. For clarifying as of today the Government owns about 29-30 % of state property. 70 % of state property is already privatized. We had 30 % and therefore I am saying 29-30% as we already privatized some enterprises.  
There is also the privatization of the Energy sector. Could you tell us what you think are the opportunities for investing in this sector, which could be so strategic for Kyrgyzstan in the years to come, and the role that foreign investment could play in developing it?

We really should start from this year the privatization of one of the energy distribution companies according to the privatization program of energy sector. And I would like to say that weather we like it or not we earlier or later will come to stage of privatizing energy sector. And without investing to the energy system we are not able to independently develop this sector. But looking to our current problems, processes I could say that perhaps, for the moment we have to wait for a while with privatization process here. As by transferring the ownership to private hands we will of course transfer enormous rights to investor or private company concerning cutting off electricity, independent rising of tariffs and it of course will influence the social issues in our country. Therefore we think that for a while we will wait with privatization of energy system. But privatization is not only transferring the ownership, there are other forms of privatization. For the moment we are considering possible transfer to concession, for example. At the moment we are in the process of considerations as this is very serious issue. We should approach to this issue very thoughtfully and weigh everything.

How would you describe the investment climate here in Kyrgyzstan to our readers and what do you think it will be like in couple of years?

You know in general I could say that we have many problems in creating investment climate. But I think that we have done a lot of as our country is not reach in natural resources, does not have favorable geopolitical climate. We just have to create artificial investment conditions but I think that in future we will be a liberal country, which will create maximum conditions so that investors would work here. I even don't exclude that politicians can raise up the issue on becoming Kyrgyzstan as an off-shore zone. Therefore we should maximally create conditions for investors. This is our only way out.

Do you think that the more investors come to Kyrgyzstan, the more favorable the investment climate will become, just by mere force of their presence here. What is SPF doing to attract all those investors in terms of attracting and informing and encouraging them?

I am not sure that the more investors will come to Kyrgyzstan the better will be because the possibilities of Kyrgyzstan are limited. For example comparing with Russia, so billions of dollars are needed in order to raise the economy of Russia. And if to invest all those billions to Kyrgyzstan, it would just not be able to digest them. Therefore we need so much, what we need. But what are we doing? Every year we are conducting investment summit with participation of foreign investors, which are considered to be the biggest ones within the Kyrgyzstan scale. This is what you told about Reemtsma, Cumtor Company. In the beginning I didn't pay attention to this but later start to think about it and it turned to me to be very important. So we are sitting together - Government from one hand and investors from the other hand and they are asking us questions, raise to us their problems. We are asking each other different questions. But mainly they are asking us. Why we are not doing this or that? If we are not able to do this or that we explain them why we are not able, and if there are certain subjective reasons then we try to correct it during the next year. This way we are creating "barriers matrix", which interfere foreign investors to work here in Kyrgyzstan. Nowadays this matrix is very popular. And during the next year we are coping with those barriers we had created ourselves with full courage. As Ruzvelt told.

One last question and this is more about yourself. You are very young person to be seating in this place and I am sure that there is a lot of accomplishment behind you that had brought you here. Perhaps, you can tell about some of them, what you feel more satisfied with and perhaps you feel most challenged in this very task of running the SPF?

I am 33 years old, yesterday I had a birthday, I graduated Legal Faculty of KSNU, diplomatic academy of Russian Federation, and passed training in Institution named after George Marshall for half a year on the security issues. I worked with Government in the President's Administration, was a Deputy Minister of Investments, and the last time President's Assistant, nowadays I am a chairman of this Fund. What I have done - it is difficult to enumerate own achievements, this should be told by people. But the most important I would like to do that 98 % of property would be under private ownership and 2 % under state ownership in our country. Of course by legal and qualitative way because I am sure that the basis of any government is private property and the last thing will stay on earth is the private property if there will be no any state.

I am sure you can do this and wish you luck.

Note: Winne cannot be held responsible for the content of unedited transcriptions.

  Read on